Gothe3 years ago @DestroyerR Kalegos places the aura above the battlecry. I think in Magtheridon's case, it wouldn't really make sense to place the "aura" above the battlecry and changing ti would make it too long. I think the same can be said here.
Changing it would result in it being
"This is Immune while they're holding one Battlecry: Give your opponent three Carrots." but the aura doesn't make any sense as it doesn't establish what "one" or "they're" is.
It would have to be retooled into something like:
"Immune while your opponent holds a Carrot Battlecry: Give your opponent three Carrots."
To sum up, I think the wording is justified because it saves on space.
DestroyerR (creator)3 years ago @Astrobur the aura effect usually comes after the battlecry if it depends on it to make sense, see Magtheridon for example
Asrobur 3 years ago Te "this is immune while your opponent is holding a carrot" should come before the battlecry, since it's not realy part of it
DragonicDoom3 years ago I think I prefer this version to the other one.
TheArcanist (4.4)3 years ago Virmen Sensei isn't a Beast, so this shouldn't be either. Also, this is so easily abusable in Mill Rogue I wouldn't make it a Neutral. Cool card nonetheless.
TheFriendlyEnemy 3 years ago Hoptallus+Shadowstep :jaraxxus-thinking:
ElementOfSky3 years ago Pretty cool card, love the idea. also i dont think the vermin are beasts.
DestroyerR (creator)3 years ago @DragonicDoom it’s a virmen, so no. I did a weaker version as a 3/2/3 that adds 2 carrots, do you think that would be better?
DragonicDoom3 years ago Oh god imagine this with Brann! But this seems pretty fair, since its only a 2/1, though should it not be a Beast?
@DestroyerR Kalegos places the aura above the battlecry. I think in Magtheridon's case, it wouldn't really make sense to place the "aura" above the battlecry and changing ti would make it too long. I think the same can be said here.
Changing it would result in it being
"This is Immune while they're holding one
Battlecry: Give your opponent three Carrots." but the aura doesn't make any sense as it doesn't establish what "one" or "they're" is.
It would have to be retooled into something like:
"Immune while your opponent holds a Carrot
Battlecry: Give your opponent three Carrots."
To sum up, I think the wording is justified because it saves on space.
@Astrobur the aura effect usually comes after the battlecry if it depends on it to make sense, see Magtheridon for example
Te "this is immune while your opponent is holding a carrot" should come before the battlecry, since it's not realy part of it
I think I prefer this version to the other one.
Mill shudderwock?
Great card. :)
Virmen Sensei isn't a Beast, so this shouldn't be either. Also, this is so easily abusable in Mill Rogue I wouldn't make it a Neutral. Cool card nonetheless.
Hoptallus+Shadowstep :jaraxxus-thinking:
Pretty cool card, love the idea. also i dont think the vermin are beasts.
@DragonicDoom it’s a virmen, so no. I did a weaker version as a 3/2/3 that adds 2 carrots, do you think that would be better?
Oh god imagine this with Brann! But this seems pretty fair, since its only a 2/1, though should it not be a Beast?