Friendly Chat - Custom Hearthstone Card

Similar Cards:

Friendly Chat

3rd January, 2014 ( Basic) ()

Made by Nikko

Nikko (creator)1 year ago (sticked)
Discord Server: https://discord.gg/mFsZHbmQbb
ironwarrior79 2 hours ago
Wait so Orcs are saying sex constantly? Intriguing
Kapiork 3 hours ago
I think I know why Shadow went full . "Zug zug", while popularized by Warcraft orcs, was originally from a comedy film "Caveman". In said film, "zug zug" meant "sex." We all know how Shadow can get.
MosnarNoedig 3 hours ago
@FriendlyShadow, im boutta zug your zug if you don't cap the gobbler
ironwarrior79 3 hours ago
@Mzop, I feel that.
FriendlyShadow 3 hours ago
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
FriendlyShadow 4 hours ago
@Mzop, I am working on an expansion for like a week and I'm not even making any cards.
Mzop 4 hours ago
its depressing how many times ive tried to make an expansion and just stopped because of not enough time, ideas or art.
Gothe 8 hours ago
@Kath, oh, it's a tremendous amount of pretty tedious work
Kath 10 hours ago
@MosnarNoedig,
Yea i save all my cards permanently even if they are not in the gallery
MosnarNoedig 10 hours ago
Oh, and make sure to save permanent links for them
or they disappear after a certain length of time
Kath 10 hours ago
Thats a lot of work
DustenStein 10 hours ago
If you're asking about how to create expansions that appear in the gallery, that's a different story. To do those, you have to REMAKE ALL CARDS for your expansion within a certain period of time and attach them as tokens, 1 by 1, just like you would with a normal card
DustenStein 10 hours ago
You go to "Class Creator" on the bottom right.
There, you choose "Expansion" in the drop-down menu.
To add a card to that expansion, go to the green "+"
You can only attach cards that you've saved permanently. To do that, after you "create" a card, click "generate permanent link"
Kath 10 hours ago
How to make an expansion?
Caesar 11 hours ago
It's a feature!
DustenStein 11 hours ago
"It's not a bug, mom!"
Caesar 11 hours ago
He's like "Nope, I won't listen to you Shaman. I'm only attacking who I want at the end of the turn"
Caesar 11 hours ago
lol
DustenStein 11 hours ago
His ol' bones just won't keep moving
Caesar 11 hours ago
So...ehm...is Lothar supposed to be Frozen for 2 turns in a row by a single Blizzard?
I feel like I just lost to a bug
MosnarNoedig 1 day ago
The buff to Halkias is good imo
the Stealth means you get to control when it dies, so you can reliably proc the Deathrattle
granted it still doesn't do enough to make the archetype viable, but I like it.
Nekkro 1 day ago
To make Halkias playable they need to reprint Plagiarize, three times.
DustenStein 1 day ago
No, you just need to control the Secret that requires your opponent to spend all their Mana. If it resummoned Halkias just by itself that would be bad design
Nekkro 1 day ago
@DustenStein, Sadly it says "When" and no "After", so the Secret triggers at the same time that Halkias die, and the effect cancels cause there is no Secret to stole Halkias Soul.
DustenStein 1 day ago
They'll address the issue when they inevitably print "Murder Accusation" in the mini-set
Nekkro 1 day ago
I like how the buff to Halkias dosn't solve at all the reason that why Halkias was bad to begin.
But at least now is an average card.
DustenStein 1 day ago
I like Bash a lot. It's like Drain Soul but even better
Almost feels like an entirely new card
Poondaedalin 1 day ago
(Sanguine isn’t a Core card but you get what I mean)
Poondaedalin 1 day ago
The Bash and Slam buffs caught me completely off guard. I get that Warrior is in a weak spot rn, but between those two, Crazed Taskmaster, Imbued Axe, and Sanguine Depths, they buffed a LOT of Core Warrior cards.
DustenStein 1 day ago
Smart
mae 1 day ago
what do you think about nerfs?
Gothe 1 day ago
yes, @HolyBrandon, that is indeed a card
HolyBrandon 1 day ago

Kath 1 day ago
@Gothe,
okay, ty
Gothe 1 day ago
@Kath, "Whenever this destroys an enemy minion, deal that minion's Attack as damage to the enemy hero."
There's a ton of slightly different ways of writing it. But I (think) this is the best way of doing it. You don't have to specify opponent's minion when you can say enemy minions since if they're an enemy, they're your opponent's anyways.
Kath 1 day ago
Is this worded good?
"Whenever this minion destroys an opponent's minion, deal damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed minion's Attack"
and if not what should I change and which class you think this effect can suit the best?
Kath 1 day ago
@Gothe,
okay, I just wondered because when I play Dawngrasp and he casts a spell that let me Discover a spell, it doesnt let me do it and I get a random spell.
Gothe 1 day ago
@Kath, It would only let you Discover the spell if it was on your turn when it died. If it died on your opponent's turn, then you basically get a random spell.
I think it would be better if you worded it as "Deathratte: Add a random spell to your hand. If it's your turn, Discover one instead." It just makes things a bit more clear.
DustenStein 1 day ago
Goodbye, all my Hunter Wildseed cards

Kath 1 day ago
Does "Deathrattle: Discover a spell (for example)" works?
Nekkro 1 day ago
Warhorse Trainer*
Nekkro 1 day ago
I'm going to take the buff to Warhorse Trailer as an invitation to burn this world to ashes.
Caesar 1 day ago
Yeah I had that too with K'T to help finish with either Draka or Smite...never really went apeshit with topdecks though ahahah
But damn, that deck you made could have totally worked even outside the topdecks combo
DustenStein 1 day ago
My idea was that you play Edwin, go apeshit with topdecks and then finish with dagger so I cut Scabbs to avoid topdecking him. Took a second door instead
Caesar 1 day ago
Yoo that's so interesting
(I cut Scabbs and Crab for Edwin consistency...also a bad choice ahahahah )
DustenStein 1 day ago
lmao
Caesar 1 day ago
Ahahahah yeah right?! Same happened to me but I ran Smite and Kael'thas, that was a very bad choice
DustenStein 1 day ago
With the exception of Scabbs, I had it 1:1
DustenStein 1 day ago
You know what's really funny? I made a variation of that deck on day 1 but got fucked mercilessly so I deleted it once I heard that the seemingly superior Coin Miracle Rogue was bad
DustenStein 1 day ago
I just checked out the Master's Tour video and yeah, I see it
Caesar 1 day ago
I just realized I don't even know half of the keywords in my own language
Caesar 1 day ago
@Dusten I think it's because it is a recent deck. Vicious Syndicate doesn't have stats for it yet. This is the code AAECAaIHBqH5A+2ABPuKBNi2BPTdBPbdBAyq6wP+7gOh9
AO9gAT2nwT3nwT7pQT5rAS3swSKyQT13QTBgwUA
(Fillefighter/Door of Shadows are interchangeable)
DustenStein 1 day ago
Interesting
Kapiork 1 day ago
[In English this would be: "Battlecry: Fish out a card. If it's a Mech, draw it."]
Kapiork 1 day ago
Hey, remember when someone made a card to show that "Discover a card" doesn't make sense and should be just "Discover", to which I said it's too confusing just like "Dredge" being stand-alone? ("Dredge. If it's a [something]" looks weird to me. Hard to tell what the "it" is at first glance) Well, guess what: in the Polish translation, Dredge is literally "Fish out a card". Yes, "a card" is a part of a keyword.

Caesar 1 day ago
86% is just my WR in a smaller sample size, it will go down. Such high WR would be insane as a global number
But the deck is good already and can only get better with the buff and refinement
DustenStein 1 day ago
Woah, really? I have never heard of that. That's interesting
RasmusVJS 1 day ago
It's not 86% at lower ranks, but it still seems to be about 50% at Gold, though it is not a particularly popular deck.
Caesar 1 day ago
And by "great" I mean really great, like 86% WR at top 1k. It was also performing very well at this master tour, with no extra polarizing matchups against it.
It is very difficult to play though, so it still sucks below diamond
Caesar 1 day ago
Pure Miracle sucks, but Rogue has a great deck in Tempo/Thief Rogue that also runs Draka and Sinstone
DustenStein 1 day ago
It's good when it works but it doesn't the majority of the time. It has winrate below 50%
DustenStein 1 day ago
No it's not
RasmusVJS 1 day ago
How is Rogue near unplayable? The tempo/miracle deck is quite strong.
Caesar 1 day ago
Cool cool, then Mage or Hunter are probably the best in terms of playability+value
DustenStein 1 day ago
Big Spell Mage and Skeleton-Wildfire Mage are the strongest right now
Kapiork 1 day ago
I don't think I ever got above Gold, so I should be fine.
Caesar 1 day ago
And Mech Mage comes with Balinda right? I guess it's good that you can get her in case you want to pivot to Big Spell
Caesar 1 day ago
It also very much depends on your rank. I guess Mech Mage/Paladin or Quest Warrior are still decent picks until Gold
Kapiork 1 day ago
Alright, Mage it is!
Kapiork 1 day ago
Right, Implock exists. I've heard some good stuff about it.
DustenStein 1 day ago
@Kapiork, Currently, Warrior, Demon Hunter, Rogue and Paladin look nearly unplayable. The other classes have good stuff. Mage looks good, Druid is alright, Imp Warlock is strong and Hunter is pretty good as well
Kapiork 1 day ago
I honestly don't know. :/ I guess I want a decent deck. Is Mech Mage good right now? 'Cause that seems pretty fun.
Caesar 1 day ago
@Dusten pre-built decks for new and returning players, Kapiork was probably offline for a long time
DustenStein 1 day ago
This sign won't help me because I can't read
Caesar 1 day ago
Depends on what you want, the best choice changes depending on your collection and if you want a deck you can start playing and expect to do something, or if you want a deck with most overall rarity
Kapiork 1 day ago
yep

DustenStein 1 day ago
free deck?
Kapiork 1 day ago
Which free deck do I pick, guys?
DustenStein 1 day ago
What'd you get?
DustenStein 1 day ago
Yeah, they have "welcome back" things now
Kapiork 1 day ago
Holy crab, I was out for so long that I got greeted with this

Ignitortube 2 days ago
rating shmating, lets just make some cards
Kapiork 2 days ago
@FriendlyShadow, And so is age

Wait, why is FBI on my doorstep?
CakeIsGood 2 days ago
the checkmark thing is gone
Murozondy 2 days ago
@CakeIsGood
Yes, as I wrote in the comment to Dusten, I assumed you were simply wrong. No problem ;)
CakeIsGood 2 days ago
f
FriendlyShadow 2 days ago
I mean, rating is just a number.
Nekkro 2 days ago
@CakeIsGood, You're not the lowest, honey.
I saw people with less than 3.
CakeIsGood 2 days ago
Im proud to announce i have the lowest rated creator rating and the lowest rated card.
CakeIsGood 2 days ago
@Muroz i honestly thought it was in the queue and the reason i dont just go into the queue is so i dont just see dumb cards with no effort and that makes no sense.
ironwarrior79 2 days ago
So now the creator can’t get hide they voted their own card interesting.
Gokee 2 days ago
@FriendlyShadow Oh cool. Thanks.
FriendlyShadow 2 days ago
If you have one, that means youv've voted to the crurent card.
Gokee 3 days ago
What are the check marks next to people's comments?
DustenStein 3 days ago
I believe only non-gallery cards are hidden that way but it might as well not do anything
Murozondy 3 days ago
@DustenStein
I like the ability to look at a user's gallery, and I don't want to deny it to others. I don't know if you can make the cards "private" individually, but if the option is not to make your gallery public, then I prefer to have it public.
I mean, I also like to look at other users' gallery, but I would never comment on a card that is not in queue. I think @Cake just got it wrong and thought that card was in queue, that's why I wanted to write the message below :)
DustenStein 3 days ago
But that might be for the "my cards" gallery only
DustenStein 3 days ago
I believe you can go to "my cards" and toggle something to make the private
Murozondy 3 days ago
@CakeIsGood
(I write here because I don't know where else to do it ).
I saw you commented on one of my cards even though I didn't even queue it. I'm glad to know that you look at my cards but, in fact, for those that I don't queue, it usually means that they are not yet ready (in my opinion), to be discussed, so it usually makes no sense to comment on my cards that are not in queue. Now, in the specific case you have commented on a keyword card, which, although still incomplete, it was good and useful for me to know your feedback, but in the future look first if a card is in the queue, because you could spend time and energy to comment a card without its author really wanting feedback on that card, or finding your ignored comments (for no other reason, simply because you can forget about those cards.
You know how many times I have forgotten the existence of my cards not in queue? )
That's all, actually I was very pleased to know your opinion on that keyword :)