ironwarrior792 hours ago Wait so Orcs are saying sex constantly? Intriguing
Kapiork3 hours ago I think I know why Shadow went full . "Zug zug", while popularized by Warcraft orcs, was originally from a comedy film "Caveman". In said film, "zug zug" meant "sex." We all know how Shadow can get.
MosnarNoedig3 hours ago @FriendlyShadow, im boutta zug your zug if you don't cap the gobbler
DustenStein10 hours ago If you're asking about how to create expansions that appear in the gallery, that's a different story. To do those, you have to REMAKE ALL CARDS for your expansion within a certain period of time and attach them as tokens, 1 by 1, just like you would with a normal card
DustenStein10 hours ago You go to "Class Creator" on the bottom right.
There, you choose "Expansion" in the drop-down menu.
To add a card to that expansion, go to the green "+"
You can only attach cards that you've saved permanently. To do that, after you "create" a card, click "generate permanent link"
DustenStein11 hours ago His ol' bones just won't keep moving
Caesar11 hours ago So...ehm...is Lothar supposed to be Frozen for 2 turns in a row by a single Blizzard?
I feel like I just lost to a bug
MosnarNoedig1 day ago The buff to Halkias is good imo
the Stealth means you get to control when it dies, so you can reliably proc the Deathrattle
granted it still doesn't do enough to make the archetype viable, but I like it.
Nekkro1 day ago To make Halkias playable they need to reprint Plagiarize, three times.
DustenStein1 day ago No, you just need to control the Secret that requires your opponent to spend all their Mana. If it resummoned Halkias just by itself that would be bad design
Nekkro1 day ago @DustenStein, Sadly it says "When" and no "After", so the Secret triggers at the same time that Halkias die, and the effect cancels cause there is no Secret to stole Halkias Soul.
DustenStein1 day ago They'll address the issue when they inevitably print "Murder Accusation" in the mini-set
Nekkro1 day ago I like how the buff to Halkias dosn't solve at all the reason that why Halkias was bad to begin.
But at least now is an average card.
DustenStein1 day ago I like Bash a lot. It's like Drain Soul but even better
Almost feels like an entirely new card
Poondaedalin1 day ago (Sanguine isn’t a Core card but you get what I mean)
Poondaedalin1 day ago The Bash and Slam buffs caught me completely off guard. I get that Warrior is in a weak spot rn, but between those two, Crazed Taskmaster, Imbued Axe, and Sanguine Depths, they buffed a LOT of Core Warrior cards.
Gothe1 day ago @Kath, "Whenever this destroys an enemy minion, deal that minion's Attack as damage to the enemy hero."
There's a ton of slightly different ways of writing it. But I (think) this is the best way of doing it. You don't have to specify opponent's minion when you can say enemy minions since if they're an enemy, they're your opponent's anyways.
Kath1 day ago Is this worded good?
"Whenever this minion destroys an opponent's minion, deal damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed minion's Attack"
and if not what should I change and which class you think this effect can suit the best?
Kath1 day ago @Gothe,
okay, I just wondered because when I play Dawngrasp and he casts a spell that let me Discover a spell, it doesnt let me do it and I get a random spell.
Gothe1 day ago @Kath, It would only let you Discover the spell if it was on your turn when it died. If it died on your opponent's turn, then you basically get a random spell.
I think it would be better if you worded it as "Deathratte: Add a random spell to your hand. If it's your turn, Discover one instead." It just makes things a bit more clear.
DustenStein1 day ago Goodbye, all my Hunter Wildseed cards
Kath1 day ago Does "Deathrattle:Discover a spell (for example)" works?
Nekkro1 day ago I'm going to take the buff to Warhorse Trailer as an invitation to burn this world to ashes.
Caesar1 day ago Yeah I had that too with K'T to help finish with either Draka or Smite...never really went apeshit with topdecks though ahahah
But damn, that deck you made could have totally worked even outside the topdecks combo
DustenStein1 day ago My idea was that you play Edwin, go apeshit with topdecks and then finish with dagger so I cut Scabbs to avoid topdecking him. Took a second door instead
Caesar1 day ago Yoo that's so interesting
(I cut Scabbs and Crab for Edwin consistency...also a bad choice ahahahah )
Caesar1 day ago Ahahahah yeah right?! Same happened to me but I ran Smite and Kael'thas, that was a very bad choice
DustenStein1 day ago With the exception of Scabbs, I had it 1:1
DustenStein1 day ago You know what's really funny? I made a variation of that deck on day 1 but got fucked mercilessly so I deleted it once I heard that the seemingly superior Coin Miracle Rogue was bad
DustenStein1 day ago I just checked out the Master's Tour video and yeah, I see it
Caesar1 day ago I just realized I don't even know half of the keywords in my own language
Caesar1 day ago @Dusten I think it's because it is a recent deck. Vicious Syndicate doesn't have stats for it yet. This is the code AAECAaIHBqH5A+2ABPuKBNi2BPTdBPbdBAyq6wP+7gOh9 AO9gAT2nwT3nwT7pQT5rAS3swSKyQT13QTBgwUA
(Fillefighter/Door of Shadows are interchangeable)
Kapiork1 day ago [In English this would be: "Battlecry: Fish out a card. If it's a Mech, draw it."]
Kapiork1 day ago Hey, remember when someone made a card to show that "Discover a card" doesn't make sense and should be just "Discover", to which I said it's too confusing just like "Dredge" being stand-alone? ("Dredge. If it's a [something]" looks weird to me. Hard to tell what the "it" is at first glance) Well, guess what: in the Polish translation, Dredge is literally "Fish out a card". Yes, "a card" is a part of a keyword.
Caesar1 day ago 86% is just my WR in a smaller sample size, it will go down. Such high WR would be insane as a global number
But the deck is good already and can only get better with the buff and refinement
DustenStein1 day ago Woah, really? I have never heard of that. That's interesting
RasmusVJS1 day ago It's not 86% at lower ranks, but it still seems to be about 50% at Gold, though it is not a particularly popular deck.
Caesar1 day ago And by "great" I mean really great, like 86% WR at top 1k. It was also performing very well at this master tour, with no extra polarizing matchups against it.
It is very difficult to play though, so it still sucks below diamond
Caesar1 day ago Pure Miracle sucks, but Rogue has a great deck in Tempo/Thief Rogue that also runs Draka and Sinstone
DustenStein1 day ago It's good when it works but it doesn't the majority of the time. It has winrate below 50%
Kapiork1 day ago Right, Implock exists. I've heard some good stuff about it.
DustenStein1 day ago @Kapiork, Currently, Warrior, Demon Hunter, Rogue and Paladin look nearly unplayable. The other classes have good stuff. Mage looks good, Druid is alright, Imp Warlock is strong and Hunter is pretty good as well
Kapiork1 day ago I honestly don't know. :/ I guess I want a decent deck. Is Mech Mage good right now? 'Cause that seems pretty fun.
Caesar1 day ago @Dusten pre-built decks for new and returning players, Kapiork was probably offline for a long time
DustenStein1 day ago This sign won't help me because I can't read
Caesar1 day ago Depends on what you want, the best choice changes depending on your collection and if you want a deck you can start playing and expect to do something, or if you want a deck with most overall rarity
FriendlyShadow2 days ago I mean, rating is just a number.
Nekkro2 days ago @CakeIsGood, You're not the lowest, honey.
I saw people with less than 3.
CakeIsGood2 days ago Im proud to announce i have the lowest rated creator rating and the lowest rated card.
CakeIsGood2 days ago @Muroz i honestly thought it was in the queue and the reason i dont just go into the queue is so i dont just see dumb cards with no effort and that makes no sense.
ironwarrior792 days ago So now the creator can’t get hide they voted their own card interesting.
FriendlyShadow2 days ago If you have one, that means youv've voted to the crurent card.
Gokee3 days ago What are the check marks next to people's comments?
DustenStein3 days ago I believe only non-gallery cards are hidden that way but it might as well not do anything
Murozondy3 days ago @DustenStein I like the ability to look at a user's gallery, and I don't want to deny it to others. I don't know if you can make the cards "private" individually, but if the option is not to make your gallery public, then I prefer to have it public.
I mean, I also like to look at other users' gallery, but I would never comment on a card that is not in queue. I think @Cake just got it wrong and thought that card was in queue, that's why I wanted to write the message below :)
DustenStein3 days ago But that might be for the "my cards" gallery only
DustenStein3 days ago I believe you can go to "my cards" and toggle something to make the private
Murozondy3 days ago @CakeIsGood (I write here because I don't know where else to do it ).
I saw you commented on one of my cards even though I didn't even queue it. I'm glad to know that you look at my cards but, in fact, for those that I don't queue, it usually means that they are not yet ready (in my opinion), to be discussed, so it usually makes no sense to comment on my cards that are not in queue. Now, in the specific case you have commented on a keyword card, which, although still incomplete, it was good and useful for me to know your feedback, but in the future look first if a card is in the queue, because you could spend time and energy to comment a card without its author really wanting feedback on that card, or finding your ignored comments (for no other reason, simply because you can forget about those cards.
You know how many times I have forgotten the existence of my cards not in queue? )
That's all, actually I was very pleased to know your opinion on that keyword :)
Basic) (
Discord Server: https://discord.gg/mFsZHbmQbb
Wait so Orcs are saying sex constantly? Intriguing
I think I know why Shadow went full
@FriendlyShadow, im boutta zug your zug if you don't cap the gobbler
@Mzop, I feel that.
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
ZUG ZUG
@Mzop, I am working on an expansion for like a week and I'm not even making any cards.
its depressing how many times ive tried to make an expansion and just stopped because of not enough time, ideas or art.
@Kath, oh, it's a tremendous amount of pretty tedious work
@MosnarNoedig,
Yea i save all my cards permanently even if they are not in the gallery
Oh, and make sure to save permanent links for them
or they disappear after a certain length of time
Thats a lot of work
If you're asking about how to create expansions that appear in the gallery, that's a different story. To do those, you have to REMAKE ALL CARDS for your expansion within a certain period of time and attach them as tokens, 1 by 1, just like you would with a normal card
You go to "Class Creator" on the bottom right.
There, you choose "Expansion" in the drop-down menu.
To add a card to that expansion, go to the green "+"
You can only attach cards that you've saved permanently. To do that, after you "create" a card, click "generate permanent link"
How to make an expansion?
It's a feature!
"It's not a bug, mom!"
He's like "Nope, I won't listen to you Shaman. I'm only attacking who I want at the end of the turn"
lol
His ol' bones just won't keep moving
So...ehm...is Lothar supposed to be Frozen for 2 turns in a row by a single Blizzard?
I feel like I just lost to a bug
The buff to Halkias is good imo
the Stealth means you get to control when it dies, so you can reliably proc the Deathrattle
granted it still doesn't do enough to make the archetype viable, but I like it.
To make Halkias playable they need to reprint Plagiarize, three times.
No, you just need to control the Secret that requires your opponent to spend all their Mana. If it resummoned Halkias just by itself that would be bad design
@DustenStein, Sadly it says "When" and no "After", so the Secret triggers at the same time that Halkias die, and the effect cancels cause there is no Secret to stole Halkias Soul.
They'll address the issue when they inevitably print "Murder Accusation" in the mini-set
I like how the buff to Halkias dosn't solve at all the reason that why Halkias was bad to begin.
But at least now is an average card.
I like Bash a lot. It's like Drain Soul but even better
Almost feels like an entirely new card
(Sanguine isn’t a Core card but you get what I mean)
The Bash and Slam buffs caught me completely off guard. I get that Warrior is in a weak spot rn, but between those two, Crazed Taskmaster, Imbued Axe, and Sanguine Depths, they buffed a LOT of Core Warrior cards.
Smart
what do you think about nerfs?
yes, @HolyBrandon, that is indeed a card
@Gothe,
okay, ty
@Kath, "Whenever this destroys an enemy minion, deal that minion's Attack as damage to the enemy hero."
There's a ton of slightly different ways of writing it. But I (think) this is the best way of doing it. You don't have to specify opponent's minion when you can say enemy minions since if they're an enemy, they're your opponent's anyways.
Is this worded good?
"Whenever this minion destroys an opponent's minion, deal damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed minion's Attack"
and if not what should I change and which class you think this effect can suit the best?
@Gothe,
okay, I just wondered because when I play Dawngrasp and he casts a spell that let me Discover a spell, it doesnt let me do it and I get a random spell.
@Kath, It would only let you Discover the spell if it was on your turn when it died. If it died on your opponent's turn, then you basically get a random spell.
I think it would be better if you worded it as "Deathratte: Add a random spell to your hand. If it's your turn, Discover one instead." It just makes things a bit more clear.
Goodbye, all my Hunter Wildseed cards
Does "Deathrattle: Discover a spell (for example)" works?
Warhorse Trainer*
I'm going to take the buff to Warhorse Trailer as an invitation to burn this world to ashes.
Yeah I had that too with K'T to help finish with either Draka or Smite...never really went apeshit with topdecks though ahahah
But damn, that deck you made could have totally worked even outside the topdecks combo
My idea was that you play Edwin, go apeshit with topdecks and then finish with dagger so I cut Scabbs to avoid topdecking him. Took a second door instead
Yoo that's so interesting
(I cut Scabbs and Crab for Edwin consistency...also a bad choice ahahahah
lmao
Ahahahah yeah right?! Same happened to me but I ran Smite and Kael'thas, that was a very bad choice
With the exception of Scabbs, I had it 1:1
You know what's really funny? I made a variation of that deck on day 1 but got fucked mercilessly so I deleted it once I heard that the seemingly superior Coin Miracle Rogue was bad
I just checked out the Master's Tour video and yeah, I see it
I just realized I don't even know half of the keywords in my own language
@Dusten I think it's because it is a recent deck. Vicious Syndicate doesn't have stats for it yet. This is the code AAECAaIHBqH5A+2ABPuKBNi2BPTdBPbdBAyq6wP+7gOh9
AO9gAT2nwT3nwT7pQT5rAS3swSKyQT13QTBgwUA
(Fillefighter/Door of Shadows are interchangeable)
Interesting
[In English this would be: "Battlecry: Fish out a card. If it's a Mech, draw it."]
Hey, remember when someone made a card to show that "Discover a card" doesn't make sense and should be just "Discover", to which I said it's too confusing just like "Dredge" being stand-alone? ("Dredge. If it's a [something]" looks weird to me. Hard to tell what the "it" is at first glance) Well, guess what: in the Polish translation, Dredge is literally "Fish out a card". Yes, "a card" is a part of a keyword.
86% is just my WR in a smaller sample size, it will go down. Such high WR would be insane as a global number
But the deck is good already and can only get better with the buff and refinement
Woah, really? I have never heard of that. That's interesting
It's not 86% at lower ranks, but it still seems to be about 50% at Gold, though it is not a particularly popular deck.
And by "great" I mean really great, like 86% WR at top 1k. It was also performing very well at this master tour, with no extra polarizing matchups against it.
It is very difficult to play though, so it still sucks below diamond
Pure Miracle sucks, but Rogue has a great deck in Tempo/Thief Rogue that also runs Draka and Sinstone
It's good when it works but it doesn't the majority of the time. It has winrate below 50%
No it's not
How is Rogue near unplayable? The tempo/miracle deck is quite strong.
Cool cool, then Mage or Hunter are probably the best in terms of playability+value
Big Spell Mage and Skeleton-Wildfire Mage are the strongest right now
I don't think I ever got above Gold, so I should be fine.
And Mech Mage comes with Balinda right? I guess it's good that you can get her in case you want to pivot to Big Spell
It also very much depends on your rank. I guess Mech Mage/Paladin or Quest Warrior are still decent picks until Gold
Alright, Mage it is!
Right, Implock exists. I've heard some good stuff about it.
@Kapiork, Currently, Warrior, Demon Hunter, Rogue and Paladin look nearly unplayable. The other classes have good stuff. Mage looks good, Druid is alright, Imp Warlock is strong and Hunter is pretty good as well
I honestly don't know. :/ I guess I want a decent deck. Is Mech Mage good right now? 'Cause that seems pretty fun.
@Dusten pre-built decks for new and returning players, Kapiork was probably offline for a long time
This sign won't help me because I can't read
Depends on what you want, the best choice changes depending on your collection and if you want a deck you can start playing and expect to do something, or if you want a deck with most overall rarity
yep
free deck?
Which free deck do I pick, guys?
What'd you get?
Yeah, they have "welcome back" things now
Holy crab, I was out for so long that I got greeted with this
rating shmating, lets just make some cards
@FriendlyShadow, And so is age
Wait, why is FBI on my doorstep?
the checkmark thing is gone
@CakeIsGood
Yes, as I wrote in the comment to Dusten, I assumed you were simply wrong. No problem ;)
f
I mean, rating is just a number.
@CakeIsGood, You're not the lowest, honey.
I saw people with less than 3.
Im proud to announce i have the lowest rated creator rating and the lowest rated card.
@Muroz i honestly thought it was in the queue and the reason i dont just go into the queue is so i dont just see dumb cards with no effort and that makes no sense.
So now the creator can’t get hide they voted their own card interesting.
@FriendlyShadow Oh cool. Thanks.
If you have one, that means youv've voted to the crurent card.
What are the check marks next to people's comments?
I believe only non-gallery cards are hidden that way but it might as well not do anything
@DustenStein
I like the ability to look at a user's gallery, and I don't want to deny it to others. I don't know if you can make the cards "private" individually, but if the option is not to make your gallery public, then I prefer to have it public.
I mean, I also like to look at other users' gallery, but I would never comment on a card that is not in queue. I think @Cake just got it wrong and thought that card was in queue, that's why I wanted to write the message below :)
But that might be for the "my cards" gallery only
I believe you can go to "my cards" and toggle something to make the private
@CakeIsGood
(I write here because I don't know where else to do it
I saw you commented on one of my cards even though I didn't even queue it. I'm glad to know that you look at my cards but, in fact, for those that I don't queue, it usually means that they are not yet ready (in my opinion), to be discussed, so it usually makes no sense to comment on my cards that are not in queue. Now, in the specific case you have commented on a keyword card, which, although still incomplete, it was good and useful for me to know your feedback, but in the future look first if a card is in the queue, because you could spend time and energy to comment a card without its author really wanting feedback on that card, or finding your ignored comments (for no other reason, simply because you can forget about those cards.
You know how many times I have forgotten the existence of my cards not in queue?
That's all, actually I was very pleased to know your opinion on that keyword :)