Lucious3 years ago Well, sort of. Although you can go face and therefore don't need to lose a small minion or waste a spell/ping, Hunter's Mark guarantees a kill while this doesn't. Should definitely be 2 Mana.
keyvnn93 years ago When looking at a card like this I always ask myself “Is this worse than Hunter’s Mark?”
Thestalost3 years ago I love the design, but it may be overcosted, in my opinion. I think 2 mana would do wonders to this card, as it ask you for your opponent to control two minions, and of you to have a way to combo it in another card to have immediate value. But I may be wrong.
Qubit (creator)3 years ago Thoughts? This card doesn't do much by itself, but can cheaply destroy a minion when paired with an AoE, and allows combos in wild with Wrathguard and Treachery.
Well, sort of. Although you can go face and therefore don't need to lose a small minion or waste a spell/ping, Hunter's Mark guarantees a kill while this doesn't. Should definitely be 2 Mana.
And is it?
When looking at a card like this I always ask myself “Is this worse than Hunter’s Mark?”
I love the design, but it may be overcosted, in my opinion. I think 2 mana would do wonders to this card, as it ask you for your opponent to control two minions, and of you to have a way to combo it in another card to have immediate value. But I may be wrong.
Thoughts? This card doesn't do much by itself, but can cheaply destroy a minion when paired with an AoE, and allows combos in wild with Wrathguard and Treachery.