iceycle24 years ago Flame_Crzer, ah yes the well known "ocean giant" :thinking:
k1ll3rm0mJr (creator)4 years ago @Flame_Crzer which is why i made it 7 mana and only 3 cards. you can play only 2 giants extra, and next turn they might all be dead. Far more balanced than sea witch imo.
Flame_Crzer 4 years ago Nah brocken... Molten giant 0 mana mountain giant 0 mana if you have three cards. ocean giant 0 mana there are three minions... (which you will have with other giants) hella busted. its just creating naga sea witch again just 1 mana less and three card limit.
Deloa4 years ago I think it's balanced, it will likely not survive a turn, so you get to cast 1 spell for (3), seems ok.
Nibroc4 years ago Mage would be very happy to play this alongside a Pyroblast or a Flamestrike so it seems a little strong to me. I know Kalecgos does the same thing essentially but it costs 10. Idk might be fine. Definitely interesting.
Flame_Crzer, ah yes the well known "ocean giant" :thinking:
@Flame_Crzer which is why i made it 7 mana and only 3 cards. you can play only 2 giants extra, and next turn they might all be dead. Far more balanced than sea witch imo.
Nah brocken... Molten giant 0 mana mountain giant 0 mana if you have three cards. ocean giant 0 mana there are three minions... (which you will have with other giants) hella busted. its just creating naga sea witch again just 1 mana less and three card limit.
I think it's balanced, it will likely not survive a turn, so you get to cast 1 spell for (3), seems ok.
Mage would be very happy to play this alongside a Pyroblast or a Flamestrike so it seems a little strong to me. I know Kalecgos does the same thing essentially but it costs 10. Idk might be fine. Definitely interesting.