DestroyerR (creator)4 years ago @Stevethebarbarian it’s not too strong because your opponent always will have a way to stop it. Honestly, the change you’re suggesting would still be balanced if we got rid of the condition altogether
Stevethebarbarian 4 years ago This is cool and all, but I do think that this being a permanent downside is too strong. Make it hard to get rid of (5 mana or something) but not an impossible to remove one.
DestroyerR (creator)4 years ago Meant to play mind games with your opponent. The pool the opponent will Discover from on their turn will appear, and you pick one card (secretly ofc) to sabotage. If they choose wrong, they get permanently crippled. If they don’t, you just played a 3 Mana 3/2 that gives your opponent a card. Better be smart about this. Thoughts?
@Stevethebarbarian it’s not too strong because your opponent always will have a way to stop it. Honestly, the change you’re suggesting would still be balanced if we got rid of the condition altogether
This is cool and all, but I do think that this being a permanent downside is too strong. Make it hard to get rid of (5 mana or something) but not an impossible to remove one.
Love the idea
Meant to play mind games with your opponent. The pool the opponent will Discover from on their turn will appear, and you pick one card (secretly ofc) to sabotage. If they choose wrong, they get permanently crippled. If they don’t, you just played a 3 Mana 3/2 that gives your opponent a card. Better be smart about this. Thoughts?