DustenStein 1 year ago 3 mana would definitely be fine. 2 mana is pushing it
Wishful1 year ago I mean, I absolutely love this but jesus man, Plague of Flames is literally Warlocks strongest Board clear. Now you have a technical upside to it for something that isn't too difficult to ask.(Now you can argue that, but from wild and Standard format it was in, it is a very strong card)
I would say that 3 mana is where this effect really should be at, just for the simple fact that Cascading Disaster can only get this effect by corrupting it once and its a 4 mana card.
DustenStein 1 year ago Is rather easy to corrupt at 2 mana which is great. I like this. Is probably very strong too since it's a Cascading Disaster with the downside of this also destroying all other friendly minions
TheArcanist (4.4) (creator)1 year ago A twist on Plague of Flames; requires more setup with the Corrupt but gives you two 'free' destroy effects right away. Thoughts?
3 mana would definitely be fine. 2 mana is pushing it
I mean, I absolutely love this but jesus man, Plague of Flames is literally Warlocks strongest Board clear. Now you have a technical upside to it for something that isn't too difficult to ask.(Now you can argue that, but from wild and Standard format it was in, it is a very strong card)
I would say that 3 mana is where this effect really should be at, just for the simple fact that Cascading Disaster can only get this effect by corrupting it once and its a 4 mana card.
Is rather easy to corrupt at 2 mana which is great. I like this. Is probably very strong too since it's a Cascading Disaster with the downside of this also destroying all other friendly minions
A twist on Plague of Flames; requires more setup with the Corrupt but gives you two 'free' destroy effects right away. Thoughts?