JacySteak (4.3) (creator)1 year ago Honey King skin, yep
TemplarBrandon1 year ago Yep, i play paladins and i know that's bomb king.
JacySteak (4.3) (creator)1 year ago It sure does, indeed, unless it makes the balance bad
Nekkro 1 year ago This improves non numerical effects? Like Ressurect? :jaraxxus-thinking:
Caesar (4.1)1 year ago Thing is, you need 4 Mana to play this *and* you need Spell Damage...that's like your whole turn, how do you cast a spell then?
The best I see is a Garrote Rogue with Preps, Sprints, Shadowsteps...Garrote gets very well upgraded by this but is it even good enough?
Mzop (3.7)1 year ago survival of the fittest or embiggen :annoy-o-tron:
Caesar (4.1)1 year ago I love this until someone breaks it
Murozondy 1 year ago @Rasmus
Precisely! :reno: :gonk:
RasmusVJS (3.9)1 year ago Though giving a spell already improved by Spell Damage "improved by Spell Damage" is funny. xD
RasmusVJS (3.9)1 year ago I do not like this card one bit, this seems waaay too abusable, especially with the efficient Spell Damage we get nowadays.
Honey King skin, yep
Yep, i play paladins and i know that's bomb king.
It sure does, indeed, unless it makes the balance bad
This improves non numerical effects? Like Ressurect? :jaraxxus-thinking:
Thing is, you need 4 Mana to play this *and* you need Spell Damage...that's like your whole turn, how do you cast a spell then?
The best I see is a Garrote Rogue with Preps, Sprints, Shadowsteps...Garrote gets very well upgraded by this but is it even good enough?
survival of the fittest or embiggen :annoy-o-tron:
I love this until someone breaks it
@Rasmus
Precisely! :reno: :gonk:
Though giving a spell already improved by Spell Damage "improved by Spell Damage" is funny. xD
I do not like this card one bit, this seems waaay too abusable, especially with the efficient Spell Damage we get nowadays.
Oh nice! :annoy-o-tron: