keyvnn93 years ago I think in line with the Fungal Fortunes change this could be 3 mana but in line with Fungal Fortunes and Shaman it could in theory be 2.
This would be a powerhouse at 2, which before I would say is fine in the current state of the game, but after lots of the complete powerhouses got nerfed (even those that werent necessarily oppressive in the current meta), it seems like Blizzard is (thankfully) moving away from the philosophy of “Anything can be arbitrarily powerful if the deck isn’t tier 1.”
DreMZ3 years ago I think a more pressing issue with this is that it can discover itself.
Thestalost3 years ago I would stay (3) Mana would better fit the card's balance.
Deloa3 years ago It's in line with Font of Power and Omega Assembly, which are very strong cards in the right deck, but Shaman could use more tools.
SMILE3 years ago discovering a spell for 2 is very bad, but getting 3 of them for 2 is op af
petebar (creator)3 years ago That's a strong card, i know. But Shaman really needs some good stuff to regain its strengh. Thoughts ?
I think in line with the Fungal Fortunes change this could be 3 mana but in line with Fungal Fortunes and Shaman it could in theory be 2.
This would be a powerhouse at 2, which before I would say is fine in the current state of the game, but after lots of the complete powerhouses got nerfed (even those that werent necessarily oppressive in the current meta), it seems like Blizzard is (thankfully) moving away from the philosophy of “Anything can be arbitrarily powerful if the deck isn’t tier 1.”
I think a more pressing issue with this is that it can discover itself.
I would stay (3) Mana would better fit the card's balance.
It's in line with Font of Power and Omega Assembly, which are very strong cards in the right deck, but Shaman could use more tools.
discovering a spell for 2 is very bad, but getting 3 of them for 2 is op af
That's a strong card, i know. But Shaman really needs some good stuff to regain its strengh. Thoughts ?