keyvnn93 years ago What I think Ive done in the past has been “For each [condition] gain (in order) [keywords]”
Iouxyl (creator)3 years ago Yeah, the problem was exactly the lenght of the text that prevented any clearer description.
Gosha305 3 years ago The way it's worded doesn't seem clear to me at all. But any clearer wording would probably be too long, so I really don't know...
Octotron 20003 years ago I love anything that even resembles Quetzalcoatl, even more so if it has a "Repeat for..." function, since it's underexplored.
Nice!
Iouxyl (creator)3 years ago 1 Dragon = Poisonous. 2 Dragons = Poisonous and Rush. 3 Dragons = Poisonous, Rush and Windfury.
Cosmic143 years ago So is it: 2 dragons = Poisonous and Rush
or 1 dragon = Poisonous, Rush and Windfury.
What I think Ive done in the past has been “For each [condition] gain (in order) [keywords]”
Yeah, the problem was exactly the lenght of the text that prevented any clearer description.
The way it's worded doesn't seem clear to me at all. But any clearer wording would probably be too long, so I really don't know...
Imo, this should be 5 2/5
I love anything that even resembles Quetzalcoatl, even more so if it has a "Repeat for..." function, since it's underexplored.
Nice!
1 Dragon = Poisonous. 2 Dragons = Poisonous and Rush. 3 Dragons = Poisonous, Rush and Windfury.
So is it: 2 dragons = Poisonous and Rush
or 1 dragon = Poisonous, Rush and Windfury.