CoffeeElemental3 years ago 2 mana sounds like a reasonable balance point.
The intent was to really push the new Shaman archetype, but I hadn't considered how powerful the card was as a standalone.
Marleon (4.2)3 years ago Looks way too strong comparing it to Shooting Star. Giving your Hero Attack isn't as difficult and it usually gives you quite a lot at the cost of not so much mana.
Comparing it to Shooting Star again, you can play a 2 mana card that has Spell Damage +1, to deal 2 damage to 3 things. But with this you have 3 shooting stars for the cost of one. Sure, you lose some Health in the process, but your two mana followup, Rockbitter Weapon gives you +3 Attack, making it a 4 attack weapon.
2 mana sounds like a reasonable balance point.
The intent was to really push the new Shaman archetype, but I hadn't considered how powerful the card was as a standalone.
Maybe 2 mana
Looks way too strong comparing it to Shooting Star. Giving your Hero Attack isn't as difficult and it usually gives you quite a lot at the cost of not so much mana.
Comparing it to Shooting Star again, you can play a 2 mana card that has Spell Damage +1, to deal 2 damage to 3 things. But with this you have 3 shooting stars for the cost of one. Sure, you lose some Health in the process, but your two mana followup, Rockbitter Weapon gives you +3 Attack, making it a 4 attack weapon.
Too strong in my opinion.