DustenStein 3 years ago I do agree on balance here but I gotta say that this actually uses the "they keep their original Cost" in a way that actually makes sense. Deck of Lunacy, despite being an official card is using this wording to appear more fancy than it is. Could just say "Transform all spells in your deck into random ones that cost 3 more, they cost 3 less" which would be clearer and practically the same.
Deloa3 years ago *I mean priest curve isn't really low
Deloa3 years ago @randomizer : yeah, pretty much. The cost keeping can easily be a drawback (Priest curve is really low, if anything it's the opposite) and it cost a lot for a class that doesn't have many card draw.
Randomizer3 years ago This is... worse Transmogrifier?
I do agree on balance here but I gotta say that this actually uses the "they keep their original Cost" in a way that actually makes sense. Deck of Lunacy, despite being an official card is using this wording to appear more fancy than it is. Could just say "Transform all spells in your deck into random ones that cost 3 more, they cost 3 less" which would be clearer and practically the same.
*I mean priest curve isn't really low
@randomizer : yeah, pretty much. The cost keeping can easily be a drawback (Priest curve is really low, if anything it's the opposite) and it cost a lot for a class that doesn't have many card draw.
This is... worse Transmogrifier?
>:)
Then you have a cheap deck