RasmusVJS (3.9)1 year ago Agreed. This could totally be "another class". But I think I like the idea.
DustenStein 1 year ago I'd still make this say "from another class", or "from any class" because at the moment, this is quite bad in the mirror and giving your opponent a spell from their class is quite the downside for something which is essentially a Clever Disguise for 1 mana less
Murozondy 1 year ago I love this! :qLOVE:
Nobody (creator)1 year ago This uses "from your opponent's class" because I wanted to stray away from the scenarios in which you give your opponent a card they can't use and get two that you can. Spells from your opponent's class are typically usable (in some fashion), regardless of the deck they're playing.
Anime Bribe
Agreed. This could totally be "another class". But I think I like the idea.
I'd still make this say "from another class", or "from any class" because at the moment, this is quite bad in the mirror and giving your opponent a spell from their class is quite the downside for something which is essentially a Clever Disguise for 1 mana less
I love this! :qLOVE:
This uses "from your opponent's class" because I wanted to stray away from the scenarios in which you give your opponent a card they can't use and get two that you can. Spells from your opponent's class are typically usable (in some fashion), regardless of the deck they're playing.