DatBoi (creator)1 year ago What about the wording, instead? What would you change?
DatBoi (creator)1 year ago Thanks for the feedback @Dvelis!
My initial idea was a 7 7/6 or a similar statline. The reason I changed it is because similar effects in various games have a tendency to be traps for the user more than anything. There are some situations when you can just put this down and hope it doesn't get silenced or whatever to still get your cards, but most of the time I'm sure what you would try and do is destroying it the turn you play it.
With that in mind, having bad stats would be mostly irrelevant anyway, while costing more could possibly make it unplayable very easily, but that would depend on the actual possible combos in game.
Dvelis 1 year ago i think other than some minor wording changes, this is a great card. 4 stars because maybe 2 cards or 6 mana or -1/-1 would be good for this card, it's just a little bit too strong atm
What about the wording, instead? What would you change?
Thanks for the feedback @Dvelis!
My initial idea was a 7 7/6 or a similar statline. The reason I changed it is because similar effects in various games have a tendency to be traps for the user more than anything. There are some situations when you can just put this down and hope it doesn't get silenced or whatever to still get your cards, but most of the time I'm sure what you would try and do is destroying it the turn you play it.
With that in mind, having bad stats would be mostly irrelevant anyway, while costing more could possibly make it unplayable very easily, but that would depend on the actual possible combos in game.
i think other than some minor wording changes, this is a great card. 4 stars because maybe 2 cards or 6 mana or -1/-1 would be good for this card, it's just a little bit too strong atm