DatBoi1 year ago Duskfallen Avianna you can't benefit from the turn you play it. This is cheaper Naga Sea Witch. AND while surely this makes some cards in your opponent's hand way cheaper (they could be holding a Twisting Nether), against a more aggressive deck this also doubles up as discount Loatheb.
Dvelis 1 year ago hm. so this one is very interesting, but i think it suffers from the same thing as duskfallen avianna, in which the opponent gets the benefit, or more benefits, before you do. also the mana cost is supposed to be in parenthesis
for example: all cards cost (4) until the end of your next turn
DatBoi1 year ago Yeah, the question mark is because I'm not sure it is a fix
DustenStein 1 year ago Just more Symmetrical for you because you are the one running Gnolls and Giants
Duskfallen Avianna you can't benefit from the turn you play it. This is cheaper Naga Sea Witch. AND while surely this makes some cards in your opponent's hand way cheaper (they could be holding a Twisting Nether), against a more aggressive deck this also doubles up as discount Loatheb.
hm. so this one is very interesting, but i think it suffers from the same thing as duskfallen avianna, in which the opponent gets the benefit, or more benefits, before you do. also the mana cost is supposed to be in parenthesis
for example: all cards cost (4) until the end of your next turn
Yeah, the question mark is because I'm not sure it is a fix
Just more Symmetrical for you because you are the one running Gnolls and Giants
It is symmetrical
It's Naga giants all over again!
I don't know, being symmetrical could be a fix?
Just to clear any doubts:
- Works for both players
- It's an Aura, so generated cards will also cost 4