Incautious Apprentice - Custom Hearthstone Card

Incautious Apprentice

5th January, 2022 (RR)

Made by TheArcanist

TheArcanist (4.4) (creator)2 years ago
I don't like doing dual class pairings that aren't in the game already.
King Kuba 2 years ago
Bro, you wasted potential. This is a Mage-Warlock card. Love it tho
Caesar (4.1)2 years ago
Yeah random is fine here...I mean it's Mage after all and this kind of random isn't terrible :boomS: plus look at him! Does he look like he knows what he's doing? :annoy-o-tron:
TheArcanist (4.4) (creator)2 years ago
I felt like the random effect was more fitting for the flavor of this card.
DustenStein 2 years ago
*first
DustenStein 2 years ago
Actually, targeted Discards exist in duels
as Warlock's forst Hero Power. Don't know if it would fit though
TheArcanist (4.4) (creator)2 years ago
Woah, @Spacetime0419 actually liking a card and not saying it's broken, thanks lmao

And @DustenStein unfortunately, HS doesn't have targeted discards. I could make it 'your highest Cost spell' but then you could just put it in any deck and not only one with big spells. I guess 'lowest Cost spell' could work.
DustenStein 2 years ago
since, no matter the damage dealt, you always only spend 5 mana on the card, there is only one clear desirable outcome
DustenStein 2 years ago
:/ sure don't like the fact that it's random
Spacetime0419 2 years ago
BALANCE: 5/5. (Losing the spell could be a drawback, but also can be very strong this early on a big spell. The cost/bad stats ratio alongside the losing the spell offsets the effect. FLAVOR: 5/5. (Big spell support, random damage. Checks the boxes). NAME/ART: 5/5. (This is a hallmark for how art and names should be made. The art couldn’t look more hearthstone. The name perfectly reflects its effect). TOTAL: 5/5. (This could be a printed card. There is nothing to be improved upon. Extremely well made).
TheArcanist (4.4) (creator)2 years ago
For Big Spell Mage. Helps you make use of clunky, expensive spells you won't be able to cast in faster matchups. Thoughts?