Murghlinwall (4.3) (creator)2 years ago I think there's something to be said about maybe getting to choose your favorite class and then you get all 3 for free once the last set drops or something like that if this was actually implemented
Murozondy 2 years ago @Dustenstein
In fact, I had nothing to say about that, but I don't like the discourse that there can't be 3 free class cards just because blizzard doesn't do that. I don't know, I really like this 3 leggy card per class mechanic with synergies. There don't have to be any disadvantages, just not all classes would play the 3 cards together, some archetypes don't need it. it is an addition, I personally prefer it that way, but they are tastes :)
DustenStein 2 years ago TL;DR:
what if the keyword was generalised and there were two free Neutral Legendaries that came with it
DustenStein 2 years ago I can see this being a fun concept if executed well though (which isn't easy to do). Maybe make this a keyword that isn't limited to its set. Just "If your deck contains 3 minions with this keyword, when you have 10 or less cards in your deck, get [class specific reward]". That way you could print 2 Neutral minions with the (for example) "[b]Set[/b]" keyword in the first expansion together with one for each class and then in each following expansion release one additional class card so that you could create more decks with those, either combining the class cards or switching them out each time to fit your deck. Do you get what I mean? Then, following things are fixed:
-Only two free Neutral Legendaries and a random class card are required.
-Each Legendary is more likely to work since there is at least some flexibility when it comes to the decks you can build with them.
-probably something else too which I have currently forgotten.
Would be tough to execute but imagine tho
Murghlinwall (4.3) (creator)2 years ago i see what you're saying. This is why i feel less confident in this one than the warrior concept, since those cards are designed with less synergy together, and really the only tough include here is karnuk. In my head, the drawback is that including all 3 should be greedy and make their individual synergies rougher to take advantage of
DustenStein 2 years ago I am saying that this is heavily disadvantages players who don't have all 3, unfairly rewarding those who do and making this free would remove weight from the condition
DustenStein 2 years ago What does that have to do with anything?
Murghlinwall (4.3) (creator)2 years ago yeah i choose to think we can design for a hearthstone for the people
Murozondy 2 years ago @Dustenstein
Personally, I have nothing to say about your first comment, but the second seems to me a bit of a trio of imagination. in the sense, really, we are on a site made for trying new and different things. You don't have to stick to the HS developer rules, come on, Dusten, some creative freedom.
This thing here doesn't break any rules :tinyfin:
DustenStein 2 years ago Also, most free cards are Neutral and those that aren't (only Galakrond) are just free because they are required for a lot of cards of the expansion
DustenStein 2 years ago That's a dumb solution. Making them free removes the condition almost entirely
Murozondy 2 years ago @Dustenstein
they are free, in the intentions of the creator, like Okani, Galakrond etc. :)
DustenStein 2 years ago same goes for all of these
DustenStein 2 years ago The idea is there but holy shit that's a bad p2w concept
Murozondy 2 years ago In some ways, it is even better than the other. There are some mistakes in the lyrics and the expansions, I think, but nothing major. Nice! :)
Murghlinwall (4.3) (creator)2 years ago this one is definitely not as good but i just wanted to try another exploration of the concept
I think there's something to be said about maybe getting to choose your favorite class and then you get all 3 for free once the last set drops or something like that if this was actually implemented
@Dustenstein
In fact, I had nothing to say about that, but I don't like the discourse that there can't be 3 free class cards just because blizzard doesn't do that. I don't know, I really like this 3 leggy card per class mechanic with synergies. There don't have to be any disadvantages, just not all classes would play the 3 cards together, some archetypes don't need it. it is an addition, I personally prefer it that way, but they are tastes :)
TL;DR:
what if the keyword was generalised and there were two free Neutral Legendaries that came with it
I can see this being a fun concept if executed well though (which isn't easy to do). Maybe make this a keyword that isn't limited to its set. Just "If your deck contains 3 minions with this keyword, when you have 10 or less cards in your deck, get [class specific reward]". That way you could print 2 Neutral minions with the (for example) "[b]Set[/b]" keyword in the first expansion together with one for each class and then in each following expansion release one additional class card so that you could create more decks with those, either combining the class cards or switching them out each time to fit your deck. Do you get what I mean? Then, following things are fixed:
-Only two free Neutral Legendaries and a random class card are required.
-Each Legendary is more likely to work since there is at least some flexibility when it comes to the decks you can build with them.
-probably something else too which I have currently forgotten.
Would be tough to execute but imagine tho
i see what you're saying. This is why i feel less confident in this one than the warrior concept, since those cards are designed with less synergy together, and really the only tough include here is karnuk. In my head, the drawback is that including all 3 should be greedy and make their individual synergies rougher to take advantage of
I am saying that this is heavily disadvantages players who don't have all 3, unfairly rewarding those who do and making this free would remove weight from the condition
What does that have to do with anything?
yeah i choose to think we can design for a hearthstone for the people
@Dustenstein
Personally, I have nothing to say about your first comment, but the second seems to me a bit of a trio of imagination. in the sense, really, we are on a site made for trying new and different things. You don't have to stick to the HS developer rules, come on, Dusten, some creative freedom.
This thing here doesn't break any rules :tinyfin:
Also, most free cards are Neutral and those that aren't (only Galakrond) are just free because they are required for a lot of cards of the expansion
That's a dumb solution. Making them free removes the condition almost entirely
@Dustenstein
they are free, in the intentions of the creator, like Okani, Galakrond etc. :)
same goes for all of these
The idea is there but holy shit that's a bad p2w concept
In some ways, it is even better than the other. There are some mistakes in the lyrics and the expansions, I think, but nothing major. Nice! :)
this one is definitely not as good but i just wanted to try another exploration of the concept