Murlocian4 years ago you can still discover that card ;) but would be fun to have this card :)
Wiener_Schnitzel4 years ago They do have a point, though I think that is a problem with the design of Underbelly Angler and not this card.
It really shouldn't be the case that you can't design Murlocs for other classes just because Shaman can get it from Angler and thus break it because of their Murloc support. That's really limiting design space and IMO Angler should somehow be changed.
For now though, treat this as if it's from an expansion after Rise of Shadows rotates.
Poondaedalin4 years ago Guys... Those are both Shaman cards.
Deloa4 years ago The big issue with this card is you can get it with Underbelly Angler. Although it's pretty hard to get a specific card from Angler (I very rarely get to play 3 Murloc Warleaders personally).
Ooka_Chaka_Baby4 years ago This is a pretty solid pull from Underbelly Angler and using this on Scargil. The warrior wouldn't get him but, if the game is in the Shaman's favour, a good chance to snag a grimscale forger and use it on scargil. They might already have on in play, which then is almost for sure game over for the opponent.
Nibroc4 years ago @Poondaedalin all weapons essentially have Charge already, so I don't think it would do anything.
Wiener_Schnitzel4 years ago @Poondaedalin no, you will only be able to attack again if you equip a Murloc with Windfury (not sure if there is such a Murloc though).
Poondaedalin4 years ago Quick question though. If you equip a Weapon with Charge, would it allow you to attack again, even if you had already done so that turn? (Murk-Eye would become the first Charge weapon in the game’s history)
Wiener_Schnitzel4 years ago @Kaylee-Rodriguez getting Scargil as a warrior is pretty hard though.
Kaylee-Rodriguez4 years ago this would be to insane with Scargil (your murlocs cost (1).) because you can attack 3 times for 4 damage and then save it which means you deal 12 damage and for the rest of the game murlocs cost 1
petebar4 years ago I would love to see Warrior Murlocs, and i'm ready to promote cards in order to help you push this deck (I'm a murloc fan).
Wiener_Schnitzel4 years ago The weapon loses the Murloc type of course.
you can still discover that card ;) but would be fun to have this card :)
They do have a point, though I think that is a problem with the design of Underbelly Angler and not this card.
It really shouldn't be the case that you can't design Murlocs for other classes just because Shaman can get it from Angler and thus break it because of their Murloc support. That's really limiting design space and IMO Angler should somehow be changed.
For now though, treat this as if it's from an expansion after Rise of Shadows rotates.
Guys... Those are both Shaman cards.
The big issue with this card is you can get it with Underbelly Angler. Although it's pretty hard to get a specific card from Angler (I very rarely get to play 3 Murloc Warleaders personally).
This is a pretty solid pull from Underbelly Angler and using this on Scargil. The warrior wouldn't get him but, if the game is in the Shaman's favour, a good chance to snag a grimscale forger and use it on scargil. They might already have on in play, which then is almost for sure game over for the opponent.
@Poondaedalin all weapons essentially have Charge already, so I don't think it would do anything.
:tinyfin:
*Equip a Tinyfin.*
@Poondaedalin no, you will only be able to attack again if you equip a Murloc with Windfury (not sure if there is such a Murloc though).
Quick question though. If you equip a Weapon with Charge, would it allow you to attack again, even if you had already done so that turn? (Murk-Eye would become the first Charge weapon in the game’s history)
@Kaylee-Rodriguez getting Scargil as a warrior is pretty hard though.
this would be to insane with Scargil (your murlocs cost (1).) because you can attack 3 times for 4 damage and then save it which means you deal 12 damage and for the rest of the game murlocs cost 1
I would love to see Warrior Murlocs, and i'm ready to promote cards in order to help you push this deck (I'm a murloc fan).
The weapon loses the Murloc type of course.