DatBoi (creator)1 year ago You are right, this should only count friendly minions but it's not implied.
DustenStein 1 year ago This counts enemy minions as well which may or may not be intended. I'd write "Your minions have +1/+1 for each other minion of its type you control." The current wording is odd
DatBoi (creator)1 year ago I initially liked this as a 4-Mana 2/2, but given this is a finisher more often than not, I thought upping the cost a bit could be safer.
5 would compete too much with Bloodlust, so I went for 6.
Errata
You are right, this should only count friendly minions but it's not implied.
This counts enemy minions as well which may or may not be intended. I'd write "Your minions have +1/+1 for each other minion of its type you control." The current wording is odd
I initially liked this as a 4-Mana 2/2, but given this is a finisher more often than not, I thought upping the cost a bit could be safer.
5 would compete too much with Bloodlust, so I went for 6.