twilightsoul3 years ago Since right now shaman is about spell damage it would be cool if the elemental had Spell Damage +1. Obviously with fewer stats to balance it.
DustenStein 3 years ago @k1ll3rm0mJr of course, you could do that but, you know, you can also pick the opponent to death with the Lifedrinker which is much faster and more failproof and doesn't require you to play a pretty much dead turn 10 card.
Shoemanband3 years ago @k1ll3rm0mJr If you’re going to do a multi-Shudderwock combo, I think making your spells cost 0 is one of the slower options available.
k1ll3rm0mJr3 years ago @Shoemanband Shudderwock. Enough of them and this card means that eventually all spells will cost 0, even though they cost 10 before.
The Daninator3 years ago @MosnarNoedig NO GOD PLEASE NO
MosnarNoedig3 years ago U N S T A B L E
E V O L U T I O
N
Shoemanband3 years ago I don't really see a reason why the passive effect can't be reworded as a Battlecry. "Battlecry: Your spells cost (1) less this game."
Since right now shaman is about spell damage it would be cool if the elemental had Spell Damage +1. Obviously with fewer stats to balance it.
@k1ll3rm0mJr of course, you could do that but, you know, you can also pick the opponent to death with the Lifedrinker which is much faster and more failproof and doesn't require you to play a pretty much dead turn 10 card.
@k1ll3rm0mJr If you’re going to do a multi-Shudderwock combo, I think making your spells cost 0 is one of the slower options available.
@Shoemanband Shudderwock. Enough of them and this card means that eventually all spells will cost 0, even though they cost 10 before.
@MosnarNoedig NO GOD PLEASE NO
U N S T A B L E
E V O L U T I O
N
'Awakened'
I don't really see a reason why the passive effect can't be reworded as a Battlecry. "Battlecry: Your spells cost (1) less this game."